The Honorable Antony Blinken
Secretary U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520
Dear Secretary Blinken:
We, concerned Ethiopians residing in Nebraska, urgently bring to your attention the alarming prospect of Lencho Bati, a prominent figure within the current Oromo-dominated Ethiopian regime, being appointed as Ambassador to the Ethiopian embassy in Washington, D.C.
Mr. Bati has gained notoriety for his incendiary rhetoric, notably advocating for the divisive agenda of “Deconstruct Ethiopia, Construct Oromo,” which has fomented ethnic tensions and tragically led to numerous atrocities, including the recent Merawi massacre. This rhetoric has contributed to widespread violence and even genocide against Amhara and other ethnic groups across Ethiopia.
We implore your office to carefully consider the ramifications of such an appointment. Lencho Bati and those of similar ilk must be held accountable for their actions. Like their predecessors, such as Kielbasa Negewo of Atlanta, Georgia, and Kefelegn Alemu of Colorado, who faced justice for their crimes against humanity during Ethiopia’s previous military regime, Lencho Bati and his associates should be brought before a criminal court.
We urge you to intervene and prevent the appointment of Lencho Bati to the Ethiopian embassy in Washington, D.C. It is imperative that individuals with a history of inciting violence and perpetrating human rights abuses are not given diplomatic positions in the USA.
Sincerely,
Concerned Ethiopian Americans of Nebraska
CC: The Media Genocide Watch
In the United States
Government officials and diplomats are generally expected to have clean legal records, but there are some nuances and variations depending on the position.
- Elected Officials:
- There is no federal law explicitly barring individuals with criminal records from running for or holding most elected offices. This includes positions such as President, members of Congress, governors, and state legislators. However, political opponents often scrutinize candidates’ criminal records, and voters may be less likely to support candidates with serious criminal histories.
- Appointed Positions:
- For appointed positions, such as cabinet members, federal judges, and diplomats, the selection process often includes background checks. The President or other appointing authority usually considers the appointee’s background, including any criminal history. Serious offenses can disqualify candidates, especially for roles requiring a high level of security clearance.
- Security Clearances:
- Many government positions, particularly those involving national security, require security clearances. Obtaining a clearance involves a thorough background investigation. A criminal record, especially involving felonies or offenses related to dishonesty or breaches of trust, can disqualify candidates from receiving the necessary clearance.
- Civil Service Employees:
- For regular federal employees, the hiring process includes background checks. While a criminal record does not automatically disqualify someone from all federal employment, certain positions, especially those with security or fiduciary responsibilities, may be off-limits to individuals with specific types of criminal records.
- Diplomats:
- Diplomats, including ambassadors, are often subject to rigorous vetting processes. This vetting includes background checks and scrutiny of their legal and financial histories. Any history of criminal behavior can be a significant obstacle to appointment, as diplomats represent the country abroad and must maintain high ethical standards.
In summary, while a criminal record does not necessarily preclude someone from serving in every government role in the U.S., it can be a significant barrier, particularly for positions that require high levels of trust, responsibility, and security clearance.
–