July 5, 2025
The Habesha
Abiy Ahmed: Inside the Oromo Elites’ Campaign Against Amhara Bias
In the unfolding political drama in Ethiopia, the Oromo elites have recently stepped into the spotlight with their fervent desire to reveal Abiy Ahmed’s alleged bias against the Amhara people. With voices like Dr. Milkisa Gemechu leading the charge, there is an increasing push to expose what many believe are political motives hidden beneath the facade of leadership. But what really goes on behind closed doors with Taye Dendea, Dr. Milkessa Gemechu, and Jawar Mohamed, who share history with Abiy Ahmed?
Understanding these dynamics is crucial for the Amhara struggle, as it provides insights into the broader political landscape. While some find this approach contentious, the growing discourse might just be the turning point for many. Whether through a book or ongoing dialogues, this subject is more relevant today than ever.
The Political Significance of Exposing Abiy Ahmed’s Motives
The political landscape of Ethiopia is complex and multifaceted, with Abiy Ahmed’s motives being at the heart of many debates. The recent endeavors by Oromo elites to shed light on these motives have significant implications for the broader Amhara struggle. Understanding and exposing these intentions is crucial in navigating Ethiopia’s intricate political arena.
Implications for the Amhara Struggle
The power dynamics within Ethiopia have long been influenced by ethno-political struggles, particularly between the Oromo and Amhara communities. The efforts to expose Abiy Ahmed’s motives are pivotal in shaping the future of the Amhara struggle.
Mobilizing Support Against Abiy Ahmed
Mobilizing support against Abiy Ahmed requires strategic actions from the Amhara community. By unveiling his intentions, Amhara leaders and advocates can galvanize support from local and international allies. Highlighting issues such as alleged Amhara marginalization and policies directed against them encourages unity within the Amhara and fosters solidarity from other ethnic groups disillusioned with the current administration. Broad-based support can amplify their voices on international platforms, calling for just governance and equitable treatment of all Ethiopian ethnicities.
Strengthening the Amhara Political Position
Strengthening the Amhara political position is a vital outcome of exposing Abiy Ahmed’s plans. Knowledge of his alleged objectives provides strategic insight into political negotiation and policymaking. It empowers Amhara politicians to craft informed policies and leverage their strengths within Ethiopia’s political system. By combining grassroots activism with strategic leadership, the Amhara can position themselves as a formidable force driving change and advocating for national unity through diversity.
Role of Oromo Elites in Highlighting Political Issues
Oromo elites play a significant role in the current political discourse, leveraging their platforms to highlight contentious issues surrounding Abiy Ahmed’s leadership. These influential figures bring visibility and critical analysis to the ongoing political debates and interpretations of Abiy’s policies.
Dr. Milkessa Gemechu’s Contributions
Dr. Milkessa Gemechu is a key figure in unraveling the political motives of Abiy Ahmed. His analyses and reports are essential in educating both local and international audiences on the nuanced political tactics of the current administration. With academic and field expertise, he provides comprehensive insights into Abiy’s governance style and potential ethnic biases. Dr. Milkessa’s work lays a foundation for strategic political action, aiding the Amhara and other ethnic groups in their pursuit of a more equitable Ethiopian society.
Jawar Mohamed and Taye Dendea’s Involvement
Jawar Mohamed and Taye Dendea, among other Oromo elites, significantly contribute to the discourse on Abiy Ahmed’s political strategies. Their involvement extends beyond critique; they analyze Abiy Ahmed’s governance approach, bringing to light actions perceived as divisive or authoritarian. Their outspoken voices resonate well beyond their ethnic lines, increasing awareness and urging political accountability. By actively participating in these discussions, they underscore the necessity for a political narrative centered on fairness and collective progress.
The collaboration of these figures underscores a powerful alliance that transcends ethnic divides, focused on territorial integrity and national harmony.
The collective efforts of Oromo elites are invaluable in shaping a political narrative that holds leaders accountable while striving for unity. Through their continued advocacy, these figures play instrumental roles in Ethiopia’s quest for a fair and just political order.
The political landscape of Ethiopia has been rife with allegations and controversies surrounding Abiy Ahmed’s attitudes and plans. Many have accused the Prime Minister of harboring hostility towards the Amhara community. These claims have significant political and social implications, and understanding their basis is vital to analyzing the current situation in Ethiopia.
Claims of Amhara Hostility
The notion that Abiy Ahmed exhibits hostility towards the Amhara people is a topic of intense debate. Critics argue that his policies and actions have disproportionately affected the Amhara, leading to further marginalization and political unrest.
Historical Context and Analysis
To understand the claims of Amhara hostility, one must delve into the historical context of inter-ethnic relations in Ethiopia. The Amhara have long been a significant and influential ethnic group in Ethiopian politics. Historical tensions between the Amhara and other ethnic groups, particularly the Oromos, have shaped political alliances and opposition.
Analysts suggest that Abiy Ahmed’s rise to power marked a shift in this dynamic. Some believe that his position as a member of the Oromo ethnic group has influenced his political decisions, perceived by some as undermining the Amhara’s influence.
Response from the Amhara Community
In response to these alleged hostilities, the Amhara community has become increasingly vocal. Community leaders and activists have rallied support to counteract perceived marginalization. Demonstrations and statements from Amhara political organizations highlight the growing frustration against policies perceived as discriminatory.
The Amhara’s response also extends to international platforms, seeking to raise awareness about the injustices they claim to face. Such activities aim to garner international support and pressure on Abiy Ahmed’s government to reconsider its approach to ethnic relations.
Political Strategies and Accusations
Abiy Ahmed’s political strategies have been scrutinized by various factions within Ethiopia and beyond. His leadership style and decision-making processes are subjects of frequent debate, heightening accusations of his intent to consolidate power and create divisions among ethnic lines.
Maintaining Power and Control
Critics argue that a primary objective of Abiy Ahmed’s political agenda is to maintain power. Strategies allegedly include manipulating ethnic tensions to distract from issues at the national level and solidify his rule. Such claims point to policies and actions aimed at weakening political opponents, including those representing the Amhara people.
Abiy Ahmed’s governance has seen significant restructuring of Ethiopia’s power dynamics. Accusations persist that his reforms serve more to centralize than democratize power, keeping control tightly within his administration.
Allegations of Promoting Division
Further accusations against Abiy Ahmed dwell on the suggestion that he is deliberately promoting division among Ethiopia’s ethnic groups. The strategy, according to critics, serves to destabilize potential opposition coalitions, particularly those that may form alliances against his rule.
The implications of such divisive tactics are profound, as Ethiopia’s socio-political fabric is already strained. Alleged efforts to weaken ethnic unity have the potential to exacerbate conflicts and stall progress towards inclusive governance.
This ongoing discourse around Abiy Ahmed’s attitudes and plans continues to shape Ethiopia’s political environment, demanding vigilance and active engagement from all stakeholders concerned with the nation’s future.
Importance and Credibility of Information by Dr. Milkessa
Dr. Milkessa Gemechu, a notable figure among Oromo elites, has been a vocal critic of Ethiopia’s Prime Minister, Abiy Ahmed. His insights and information have gained significant traction in recent times, especially concerning Abiy Ahmed’s alleged plans and agendas towards the Amhara community. This section delves into the importance and credibility of the claims made by Dr. Milkessa and the challenges faced in doing so.
Evaluation of Dr. Milkessa’s Claims
Credibility and Impact
Dr. Milkessa’s credibility is rooted in his long-standing presence and active involvement in Ethiopian politics. As an insider with deep connections and understanding, the weight of his claims cannot easily be dismissed. His assertions have sparked debates and brought to light Abiy Ahmed’s policies that many perceive as divisive. The impact of his revelations is substantial; he provides ammunition to those opposing Abiy Ahmed, particularly amongst the Amhara, galvanizing support and sharpening their political arguments.
Potential for Publication
The potential of compiling Dr. Milkessa’s findings into a book is immense. Not only would it offer a comprehensive view of his accusations, but it would also serve as a pivotal resource for both Ethiopian political scholars and activists. This potential publication could be a strategic tool in further exposing the controversial policies of Abiy Ahmed and strengthening the opposition‘s stance against his administration.
Challenges in Opposing Abiy Ahmed
Strategic Considerations
When opposing a powerful figure like Abiy Ahmed, strategic considerations become crucial. While exposing the truth remains a priority, the approach needs to be measured and well-thought-out to avoid unintended consequences such as increased tension or repression. Careful strategic planning is required to navigate the intricate Ethiopian political landscape effectively.
Balancing Political Narratives
Balancing political narratives is another significant challenge in this context. Opponents of Abiy Ahmed need to construct a narrative that resonates with the wider Ethiopian population without alienating potential allies. This involves highlighting Abiy’s failures and biases while advocating for unity and progression. Striking this balance is essential to ensure that the political discourse remains constructive and forward-looking, rather than descending into further divisiveness.
This note emphasizes the importance of a nuanced approach when handling sensitive political matters in Ethiopia.
In conclusion, the information provided by Dr. Milkessa is indeed influential in shaping the political opposition against Abiy Ahmed. However, the challenge lies in using this information responsibly and strategically to foster genuine change and avoid further conflict within the nation.
Great points, The Habesha. But we need to speak clearly: Abiy Ahmed is not just a bad leader — he is a liar and a master of division. From the start, he rose to power by making false promises and by turning different ethnic groups against each other.
Let’s be honest: Abiy’s main method to stay in power is by creating mistrust between ethnic groups. He has played the Amhara, Oromo, Tigray, and other ethnic groups against one another — not by mistake, but on purpose. While he talks about “medemer” and unity in public, behind closed doors he creates conflict — helping one group today and attacking them tomorrow. This is not new — his past actions prove it.
Some Oromo leaders like Dr. Milkessa Gemechu and Taye Dendea, who once worked closely with him, are now bravely telling the truth. They say Abiy has been targeting the Amhara people, starting fights between groups, and doing everything he can to hold on to power. This isn’t just bad leadership — it’s a plan to break any group that might challenge his dream of building a kingdom — a dream he says his mother told him about when he was only 7 years old, as he once proudly said in Parliament.
One of the most dangerous things Abiy has done is create conflict between the Oromo and Amhara. He allowed mass killings of Amhara people in Oromia, stayed silent, and still acted like he was neutral. He blocked Amhara voices, jailed their leaders, and attacked anyone who spoke out. Then, when war broke out with Tigray, he called on Amhara youth to fight — only to betray them later, playing the welkait and Raya cards like, they were nothing but tools in his game. That’s not leadership — that’s betrayal.
This is the pattern: Abiy starts the problems, then acts like he’s the only one who can fix them.
We need to stop using soft words. Abiy isn’t just unfair or controlling — he is a manipulator who uses ethnicity to keep power. His lies have brought war, ethnic violence, and suffering. Many voices — from the Amhara, Oromo, Tigray, and other ethnic groups — have been silenced under his rule.
For the Amhara people, and for all oppressed ethnic groups in Ethiopia, seeing the truth is no longer a choice — it’s about survival. We must work together to expose this regime’s lies. People like Dr. Milkessa and Taye Dendea are not just complaining — they are telling a deeper truth: Abiy Ahmed stays in power by keeping us divided. He is afraid of unity — because unity would end his rule.
We must reject his lies completely. Now is the time to build a new path — one based on truth, justice, and unity for all Ethiopians. Let us come together — Amhara, Oromo, Tigrayans, and all other ethnic groups — and end the rule of this fake king and his circle of loyal followers.
Wake up, Ethiopians. Enough is enough. The future of our country depends on it.
Thanks