If reasons for optimism have been hard to find on the economic governance and humanitarian fronts, they have been even more difficult on the security front. The end of the conflict in Tigray was a tremendously important and positive development, and despite outstanding issues in the implementation of the cessation of hostility agreement, that peace has held. But the fracturing of Prime Minister Abiy’s wartime coalition has led toongoing fightingin Amhara, which has now joined the conflict in Oromo as a seemingly intractable source of instability. It has also led to tension with erstwhile partnerEritrea. Perhaps seeking to rally political elites around a new crisis, Abiy’s decision to focus attention and emotion on Ethiopia’s desire for access to the sea (the country is landlocked and largely relies on Djibouti’s port for external trade) has beenunderstood as a threatto his neighbors. The latest talks between Ethiopia and Egypt regarding the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and rights to Nile water failed, prompting Egypt’s Minister of Water Resources and Irrigation to talks aiming toremindthe world that his country reserves the right to “defend its water and national security.” Security threats in and around the Red Sea arealready imposing real costs on global shipping. Bellicose rhetoric around hot-button issues involving Ethiopia only adds uncertainty to the existing turbulent environment.
The United States would very much like to see a secure, prosperous Ethiopia at peace with itself and its neighbors. Fragility in a country 120-million strong and in the strategically sensitive Horn of Africa is remarkably risky. But it’s very hard to convince oneself that Ethiopia is on a positive trajectory, and impossible not to see the multiple red flags warning of more trouble ahead.