July 12, 2025
The Habesha

Bete Orgessa was more than just a leader; he was a symbol of hope and unity for many in Ethiopia, especially within the Oromo community. In a shocking turn of events, the assassination of Bete Orgessa sent ripples of sorrow and anger across the nation. The interview with Dr. Milkesa reveals the deep frustrations with Abiy Ahmed, seen by some as a divisive leader who has betrayed his promises of democracy. When Abiy first stepped into power, the release of political prisoners and a message of peace sparked optimism. However, today’s reality paints a different picture where national unity feels threatened. With Abiy Ahmed’s actions leading to escalated ethnic tensions and unrest, the Ethiopian people are left grappling with questions about leadership, accountability, and the future of their beloved country.

Overview of Bete Urgessa’s Assassination

The assassination of Bete Urgessa is a somber chapter in Ethiopia’s recent history, marking a significant blow to the Oromo community and the nation’s quest for unity and peace. As we delve into the various aspects surrounding this tragic event, it is important to understand who Bete Urgessa was, the circumstances leading to his untimely death, and the broader implications of this profound loss.

Background of Bete Urgessa

Bete Urgessa was a prominent figure known for his unwavering commitment to the rights and empowerment of the Oromo people. His leadership and vision for an inclusive Ethiopia resonated with many, earning him both admiration and adversaries. A vocal advocate against oppression, Urgessa dedicated his life to fostering solidarity among Ethiopians, with a particular focus on addressing the historical grievances of the Oromo community. His passion for justice and equality made him not just a political leader but also a symbol of hope for many.

The Circumstances of His Assassination

The assassination of Bete Urgessa was a calculated move, a heart-wrenching act of treachery that left the nation in shock. His murder, in broad daylight, was not only a direct attack on his ideals but a clear message to any who dared to challenge the oppressive status quo. The Prosperity Party government’s alleged involvement in this heinous act underscores a strategic attempt to destabilize the Oromo movement and further entrench divisions within Ethiopia. While the specifics of the assassination remain shrouded in mystery, the tragic loss of Urgessa speaks volumes about the peril of speaking truth to power in an increasingly authoritarian regime.

Impact on the Oromo Community

The impact of Bete Urgessa’s assassination on the Oromo community cannot be overstated. It was a devastating blow to the collective morale, reverberating through the hearts of the Oromo as well as other ethnic groups who stood for justice and unity. The loss was not just about a leader; it was about the extinguishing of a beacon of hope and a silencing of a powerful voice striving for equality and integrity.

Moreover, Urgessa’s death accentuated the fractures within Ethiopia’s political landscape. His assassination is seen by many as an attempt to not only break the spirit of the Oromo but to sow seeds of division across the nation. The aftermath has compelled many Oromos to re-evaluate their place within the Ethiopian state, pushing for more robust resistance against oppression. His legacy persists, however, as a rallying point for unity and resistance against tyranny, inspiring a new generation to continue his fight for justice and equality.

The Role of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed

Initial Promises of Peace and Democracy

When Abiy Ahmed ascended to the position of Prime Minister, hopes were high for a new era of peace and democracy in Ethiopia. His rise to power marked the beginning of what many Ethiopians believed to be a transformative journey towards political openness and reconciliation. Abiy’s early actions reinforced this narrative: he released numerous political prisoners and reached out to exiled opposition leaders, signaling an apparent commitment to nurturing a more inclusive political environment.

His speeches resonated with promises of fostering unity and diminishing the long-standing ethnic animosities that had plagued Ethiopia for decades. His rhetoric, imbued with the language of peace-building and democratic inclusivity, captured hearts nationwide, painting a picture of a promising future—a stark contrast to the country’s previous authoritarian regime.

But what happened next?

Abiy’s initial months in office were characterized by a flurry of diplomatic engagements and domestic reforms aimed at restoring public trust. The enthusiastic embrace of his leadership by both local and international communities was evident.

This phase of his leadership is often referred to as the “honeymoon period,” a time when optimism soared, and citizens dared to dream of a brighter, more democratic Ethiopia.

Shift Towards Authoritarianism

However, this honeymoon was short-lived. As time progressed, the narrative began to shift dramatically. Reports of state crackdowns, media censorship, and increased incarcerations for political dissenters started to surface, signaling a shift towards authoritarianism.

Many observers began to see a darker side to Abiy Ahmed’s administration—a stark contrast to the democratic ideals he once espoused. His government started to curtail freedoms, stifle opposition voices, and implement restrictive laws under the guise of maintaining national security.

Critics argue that what began as a mission of unification slowly morphed into a power consolidation project, aiming to eliminate threats to his leadership. The establishment of the Republican Guard, a unit perceived by many as an instrument of his authoritarian ambitions, further compounds this narrative.

Is the dream of democracy slipping away?

This shift has led to significant disillusionment, with many Ethiopians questioning if the democratic aspirations initially promised were simply a façade. The once-celebrated leader is now frequently accused of employing heavy-handed tactics to maintain control, further compromising the nation’s democratic trajectory.

Accusations of Ethnic Tension Incitement

The situation escalates with numerous accusations against Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed regarding the incitement of ethnic tension. Reports indicate that his administration has allegedly utilized ethnic divisions as a political tool to consolidate power, particularly by encouraging certain groups to relocate to conflict-prone areas such as Addis Ababa with the intention of enforcing ethnic conflicts.

Many analysts point out that these accusations are not unfounded, given the consistent ethnic clashes and unrest reported across various regions. This strategy, according to critics, reflects a complex and potentially volatile political landscape, threatening national stability and unity.

The accusations put forth suggest that Abiy’s leadership, instead of serving as a bridge towards peace, has exacerbated divisiveness, propelling the nation towards further fragmentation.

The climate of suspicion and mistrust that pervades has triggered fierce debates within the Ethiopian and international communities. These tensions raise profound questions about the genuineness of Abiy’s intentions and whether his controversial leadership style is eroding the very fabric of Ethiopian society, leaving citizens worried about their future.

In conclusion, while initial promises painted a hopeful picture, the subsequent trajectory of Abiy Ahmed’s leadership has unfolded a series of challenges that question the sustainability of democracy in Ethiopia. The interplay between aspiration and reality reveals a complicated portrait of a nation in peril.

The Establishment of the Republican Guard

The creation of the Republican Guard in Ethiopia under Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s administration marked a significant transformation in the nation’s military and political dynamics. Designed to serve as an elite military unit, its very existence raises critical questions and concerns among Ethiopians and international observers alike.

Purpose and Objectives

The Republican Guard was established with the stated aim of enhancing the country’s security and protecting its political leadership. However, the objectives are far more complex. While some defenders argue that it’s crucial for ensuring the safety of the Prime Minister and key governmental figures in an increasingly volatile climate, critics assert that its true purpose may be more sinister.

The Republican Guard serves to fortify Abiy Ahmed’s grip on power. By surrounding himself with loyal and elite troops, he arguably aims to protect his administration from both external and internal threats, including potential military coups or public uprisings.

Abiy Ahmed’s administration claims it’s a move to transition Ethiopia towards a more stable governance model where theres a robust power guard. Yet, the exact mission and intentions of the Guard remain shrouded in mystery, sparking suspicion and unrest among the populace.

Impact on Political Stability

The presence of the Republican Guard has stirred unrest among political factions and the general populace. Rather than providing a sense of security, tensions have escalated due to perceptions of authoritarianism and consolidation of power.

• Increased Militarization: The establishment of the Guard hints at the militarization of politics, which often leads to power imbalances and exacerbates divisions within the Ethiopian communities.
• Intimidation Factor: For many, the Guard represents a tool for intimidation, discouraging dissent and reinforcing the administration’s authority through fear.
• Potential for Fragmentation: By possibly focusing on safeguarding a single party’s interests, it risks marginalizing other factions, which may threaten the fragile political landscape further.

The Republican Guard’s influence has undoubtedly contributed to an atmosphere of suspicion and conflict rather than peace and cohesion. While it might serve some ceremonial roles, it has intensified the concentration of military power around Abiy Ahmed, potentially destabilizing the political fabric and undermining any progress towards national unity.

The Political Climate in Ethiopia

Divisions Within the Ethiopian Communities

Ethiopia, a nation rich in cultural diversity, has witnessed profound divisions within its communities. The political landscape is marked by friction among different ethnic groups, with each vying for power and recognition. Historically, Ethiopia’s ethnic mosaic has been a source of pride, yet recent tensions threaten its unity. The push and pull of ethnic loyalties, exacerbated by political maneuvering, create a complex web of alliances and hostilities.

Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s leadership has further highlighted these divisions. While initially seen as a beacon of hope, his administration has been accused of failing to bridge the gaps between various ethnic factions. Reports suggest that his policies, rather than uniting the nation, have intensified ethnic allegiances, leaving Ethiopia’s social fabric at a precipice.

Note: Ethnic diversity in Ethiopia includes major groups like the Oromo, Amhara, Tigray, and Somali, along with several smaller groups, each with unique traditions and languages.

Reactions from the Amhara Community

The Amhara community, one of Ethiopia’s major ethnic groups, has had a tumultuous relationship with the current government. Initially supportive of Abiy’s reformist agenda, the community is increasingly vocal about its grievances. The assassination of figures like Bete Urgessa has only added fuel to the fire, shaking the trust in the government’s intentions.

There is a growing sentiment among Amhara individuals that the government has systematically marginalized their community, contrasting with the prosperity initially promised. Demonstrations and public outcries have become frequent, as the Amhara seek assurances that their rights and heritage will be protected in a rapidly shifting political landscape.

Short note: The Amhara people have historically been a dominant force in Ethiopia’s socio-political sphere and remain influential in the nation’s direction.

Broader Implications for National Unity

The divisions within Ethiopia and the specific unrest among communities like the Amhara have severe implications for national unity. With ethnic allegiances pulling the nation in different directions, Ethiopia faces the daunting challenge of maintaining its sovereignty while catering to the diverse needs of its people.

Under Abiy Ahmed’s administration, there have been attempts to forge a unified Ethiopian identity. However, these efforts are often thwarted by historical grievances and the lack of trust in centralized power. As Ethiopia stands at a crucial crossroad, the prospect of a truly united republic remains uncertain, with peace and stability hinging on genuine reconciliation and inclusive governance.

The fear is that without addressing these divisions meaningfully, Ethiopia may continue down a path of internal conflict, threatening its nationhood and the dreams of its people for a peaceful coexistence. The time for solutions is now, and the path forward demands courage, sincerity, and a commitment to Ethiopia’s rich heritage and future aspirations.

The Rising Tide Against Tribal Extremism: A Beacon of Hope for Change