U.N. chief warns U.S. funding cut may have devastating effects

3 mins read
U.N. Secretary general Antonio Guterres attends the 34th session of the Human Rights Council at the European headquarters of the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, February 27, 2017. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse
By Michelle Nichols | UNITED NATIONS

United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that a decision by the United States to withdraw all funding to the U.N. Population Fund (UNFPA) could have “devastating effects” on vulnerable women and girls around the world, a spokesman said.

The State Department said it was dropping the funding because the U.N. Population Fund “supports, or participates in the management of, a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.”

U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said on Tuesday that Guterres “believes that the decision is based on an inaccurate perception of the nature and importance of the work done by UNFPA.”

The cut marks U.S. President Donald Trump’s first move to curtail funding for the United Nations and its agencies.

U.N. agencies such as the UNFPA are funded by governments voluntarily. The United States was the fourth largest voluntary donor to UNFPA in 2015, giving $75 million in core budget and earmarked contributions.

Read Aloud:   Interview with Prince Dr. Asfa-Wossen Asserate | Part 2 | SBS Amharic

The State Department said the funding was cut because UNFPA works with the Chinese government, which “employs measures such as coercive abortion and involuntary sterilization to carry out its population-control policies.”

“While there is no evidence that UNFPA directly engages in coercive abortions or involuntary sterilizations in China, the agency continues to partner with the (government) on family planning, and thus can be found to support, or participate in the management of China’s coercive policies,” it said.

The U.N. Population Fund is focused on family planning as well as maternal and child health in more than 150 countries.

“The Secretary-General deeply regrets the decision by the United States to cut financial support for the U.N. Population Fund, which could have devastating effects on the health of vulnerable women and girls and their families around the world,” Dujarric told reporters.

He said Guterres appealed to donors to increase their support. Britain, the top donor to UNFPA, continues to support the agency, British U.N. Ambassador Matthew Rycroft said.


  • Scores reported killed in gas attack on Syrian rebel area
  • Russian metro bomb suspect a Muslim born in central Asia: investigators


Chinese U.N. Ambassador Liu Jieyi told reporters he hoped “that the U.N. agencies will receive the necessary resources to carry out their duties on behalf of the international community and for the benefit of the international community.”

Read Aloud:   Emergency Message for U.S. Citizens: Addis Ababa (Ethiopia), Potential of an Imminent Terrorist Attack in Addis Ababa, Bole Area Terrorism

1 Comment

  1. He is crying for himself and his gigantic fund-sinking organization. Funding the UN is just putting money into the sink hole. Has anything good come out of the UN other than long, winded, reports replete with vast non-sense and technical jargon? Nothing!!!!

    Why should the UN exit. Just to spy for the west and that is all.
    dismantle this organization!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

two × one =