Ethiopia Needs to Declare State of Industrialization Emergency Strategy

5 mins read

Tsegaye Tegenu, PhD

2021-11-25

State of emergency is a situation of urgent need for action when an extraordinary force poses a fundamental threat to the country. A state of emergency empowers the government to declare and execute policies that it would normally not be permitted to do. At this juncture Ethiopia needs to declare one-size-fits-all solution to all economic problems in the country. This solution is a declaration of a state of industrialization emergency which aims to increase the output and employment share of the mining, construction, and manufacturing sectors.

Under normal circumstance the government uses different theories and approaches, and sector assessment models to identify economic problems and design solutions. Due to the current external pressure and internal challenges, the government must focus on production tasks (making things) rather than providing services (doing things). Since the market approach is slow, inefficient, and inequitable, the country needs massive state intervention in linking the various economic sub-sectors (see figure).

The government must focus on manufacturing (“a process of transforming inputs into a finished product”). Manufacturing has backward and forward linkages with other sectors of the economy. Manufacturing provides also broader opportunities for capital accumulation and intensification compared to other sectors. There are possibilities of exploiting economies of scale induced by division of labor, specialization, and large-scale production. Manufacturing has also spillover effects: take the form of product and process technologies (hardware) on which software producing and software-using service sectors are based. Manufacturing is dependent on transportation infrastructure (roads, highways, bridges, rail, airports, ports), energy infrastructure (generation, transmission and disposal in nuclear, coal, gas, renewables) and telecommunications infrastructure.

Read Aloud:   Putting Unity First: Sharing the Values of Human Rights, Social Solidarity and Social Justice in Ethiopia!

In history manufacturing is recognized as the engine of economic growth, technological dynamism, and a source of the wealth of nations. However, there are various questions when formulating the manufacturing strategy and policy. For instance, from where should one start (initial step and conditions) to form the manufacturing strategy and design the implementation model? What should be considered when selecting intervention subsectors and policy instruments? What are the objectives of the manufacturing strategy and aims of the policy instruments?

Under state of emergency, it is not possible to target the entire manufacturing system (the chain of supplier–customer relationships) and subsectors (process industries, mass manufacturing industries, large/small batch industries, and extraction industries). Considering the current external pressure and country’s level of economic growth, I suggest the industrialization emergency strategy should focus on establishment of domestic arms industry, intermediate goods producing industries and agro-industries.

  • Domestic arms industries

  • Intermediate goods producing industries

  • Agro-industries

The arms industry involves the research, development and production of land-based weapons and aerospace systems for the supply of the national defense force. The arms industry should also provide the logistic support (such as food, clothing and health items).

Read Aloud:   Ethiopia: Justice for the Victims of the Meles Massacres of 2005!

The industries producing intermediate goods cover activities producing goods that are usually destined to be incorporated into other goods. This includes mineral products, chemicals, plastics, metal and electronic components.

Agro-industries are manufacturing units which add value to agricultural raw materials through processing and handling operations. The demand pull created by an agro-industrial enterprise stimulates businesses well beyond the closest links with its direct input suppliers and product buyers; a whole range of ancillary services and supporting activities in the secondary and tertiary sectors of the economy.

There is also a question as to which party should be responsible for the implementation of the strategies. The federal government should solely be responsible for establishing the arms industries. Agro-industries can be established through local government and private sector partnership in every district of the country. There are many intermediate goods that can be used for multiple purposes. Heavy industries should be managed by the federal and regional governments, while consumer goods can be produced by the private sector.

Read Aloud:   The Geopolitics of the Nile River: Egypt Confronts Ethiopia

Especially at this time of its history, Ethiopia needs an army of voluntary business and industrial economist as fanons and caeros on the practical and local fronts. The time is not only to share knowledge of theoretical models through publications and presentations, but also calculating and informing the local people on the cost and benefits of their decision making. Who will volunteer?

2 Comments

  1. The racist and fascist regime of the TPLF had been producing exaggerated and unrealistic growth figures during its misrule. It had tried to hide the worsening social and economic conditions which ignited the crisis that led to its loss of power and retreat to Makelle. The TPLF fascist regime implemented policies which resulted in the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the few from Tigray and excluded in practice and as a policy others. Besides, the TPLF regime was the largest recipient of foreign aid and loans part of which it looted and stashed out of the country. This loot is now being used to finance its network of information warfare using the western media and paid lobbyists.

  2. This is an interesting discussion on industrial development. There is no need to drag politics here (referring to the comment above). On this note, growth in the EPRDF era was measured and appraised by the World Bank and IMF, of course always deviating (lowered) from the government’s own forecast. There is no reason why Ethiopia does not revive the previous growth strategy because it had worked. In fact, the Aby government is still pursuing the same strategy with a little bit of tweaking to confirm to its so called liberalization agenda.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

10 − 6 =